Skip to main content

Deliverability

Deliverability is not a setting. It is a dozen small guarantees that have to hold at once, most of which have nothing to do with the words in your email. Settings → Email → Deliverability lists all of them on one screen, each with its real state for your account — so the question stops being “are we doing the right things?” and becomes “which row is amber?”.
Written for all three roles. Marketing needs to know what is already handled and what is not; Dev owns two of the three configurable rows; Product/Ops reads the reputation half of this page. The screen itself is deliberately readable by all three.

TL;DR

  • Fifteen levers, on one page. Nine are active by construction — they are how the platform works, with nothing to configure. Three are yours to set up. Three are not shipped or are on request.
  • The score at the top reads N levers active or configured out of 12 — the three unavailable ones are excluded rather than counted against you.
  • Every campaign is scored for spam risk while it is still in review, on the real rendered content, plus structural checks the content scanner cannot see. The score informs; it never blocks.
  • Your complaint rate is evaluated continuously against the published bulk-sender thresholds: 0.10 % raises a warning, 0.30 % is critical.
  • At the critical level, marketing sends stop automatically and resume on their own. Transactional mail is never affected.
  • Your sending domain is scanned against the major anti-spam blocklists several times a day, and a broken authentication record is raised as an incident.

The fifteen levers

Nine that are already on

These need no configuration. They are the platform’s behaviour, and they are listed rather than hidden precisely because you should be able to tell a prospect, an auditor or a worried CMO what is actually in place.

Three that are yours

Three that are not levers you can pull today

These three are shown with a plan or availability chip and excluded from the score. A screen that counted an unshipped feature as a failure would be lying to you every day.

The spam score

Every email produced by a non-live run — a review simulation, a test — is scored automatically, on the message exactly as it would ship. The verdict appears on the run panel next to that message, labelled Spam risk. Live sends are not re-scored: by then the question has been answered.

What it measures

Two independent things, deliberately. A content score, computed with SpamAssassin, the reference open-source filter. It reads the rendered message exactly as it would ship. Bands: The transactional cut is higher for a reason: a short receipt (little text, a logo, a tracking pixel) legitimately measures around 1.8. That is the normal shape of a receipt, not a risk, and alerting it would train you to ignore the indicator. Structural checks, which are data-independent and catch what a content score cannot: A structural finding lifts a green verdict to orange. It never reaches red — red stays the content filter’s own verdict.

What it does not measure

The score reads content only. Your domain reputation, your IP reputation and the live blocklist state are not in it — those live on the Reputation page. A green score on a domain with a 0.4 % complaint rate means the copy is fine and the account is not.
The score never blocks anything. It is informational by design: a red verdict is a strong reason to rewrite, not a gate. You can turn scoring off entirely for your organisation in Settings → Email → Sender, under Review spam score. It is on by default.

Reputation monitoring

Settings → Email → Reputation answers a question no single number can: how do the mailbox providers currently see you? Notifizz evaluates it continuously and states a verdict rather than leaving you to interpret raw counts.

What is measured

  • Complaint rate over a rolling 7-day window — spam reports divided by delivered mail.
  • A per-provider breakdown over 7 and 30 days — Gmail, Outlook & Microsoft, Yahoo & AOL, Apple, and others — with delivered, bounces and complaints for each. Daily counters cover closed days, so the table runs through yesterday.
  • Volume anomaly — a sudden spike relative to the preceding week. A brutal ramp looks like a compromised account to a receiver, even when it is a legitimate launch.
  • Provider blocks — the share of bounces that are reputation or policy refusals rather than dead mailboxes. This is usually the first visible symptom of a degradation, well before any spam rate moves.
  • Blocklist listings on your sending domain, from the several-times-a-day scan.
  • Authentication drift — a previously verified sending domain that no longer authenticates. See sending domain.

The verdict

Those two thresholds are not ours: they are the numbers Gmail and Yahoo published with their 2024 bulk-sender requirements. Using anyone else’s would leave you compliant with Notifizz and non-compliant with the people who actually deliver your mail. Below 100 delivered messages in the rolling window, the rate is not treated as a verdict. One complaint out of thirty is a 3.3 % rate and means nothing at all — so the level stays Healthy and the rate is shown for information only. And until you have sent anything, there is no verdict at all: the page says so rather than showing a reassuring green.
Gmail is a blind spot that has to be closed separately. Gmail does not forward individual spam reports to senders, so our own complaint rate cannot see them. Linking Google Postmaster Tools gives you the rate Gmail actually measures — and that rate can raise your Notifizz reputation level, including to critical. It never lowers it.

The automatic brake on marketing sends

This is the part worth reading before you need it. When the complaint rate reaches the critical threshold, Notifizz stops marketing sends for the organisation by itself. No ticket, no human in the loop, no waiting for someone to notice. What that means concretely, per path: Release is automatic, and deliberately not symmetric. The brake engages at 0.30 % but only releases once the rate falls back below 0.20 %. Without that gap the brake would flicker on and off around the threshold as feedback trickles in — stopping and restarting a mailing repeatedly, which is worse for your reputation than either state. The brake is visible as a banner on the Reputation page, and a launch attempted during that window tells you why it was refused rather than queueing silently.
A brake is a symptom, not a cure. It buys you the time to fix what caused the complaints — usually a stale list, an audience that never really opted in, or a send frequency nobody signed up for. It will re-engage on the next campaign if the underlying list is unchanged.

What to do at each level

FAQ

Because the maximum is 12. The three levers that are unshipped or on request are excluded from the count rather than held against you. A 12 of 12 means everything available to your account is in place.
Expected, and the two are not in contradiction. The score reads content; placement is decided mostly by reputation, authentication and recipient engagement — none of which content scoring can see. Start on the Reputation page, then check your sending domain records and, for Gmail recipients, what Gmail sees.
Not from the dashboard, no. The brake exists because a critical complaint rate damages the same sending reputation every one of your future campaigns depends on, and because the account emitting the complaints is rarely the one best placed to judge in the moment. If you believe the measurement is wrong for your account, talk to us — that conversation is the intended path.
No. Nothing about the score is a gate — it is shown so a human can decide. What does block a live send is the absence of a verified sending domain and a default sender.
Because those counters aggregate closed days. A partial current day would make every rate look different depending on the hour you opened the page. The continuous verdict at the top of the screen does include today.
Not yet, and that is honest rather than flattering. Below one hundred delivered messages in the rolling window the rate is not statistically meaningful, so the level stays Healthy and the number beside it is informational. The signals that do not depend on volume — a blocklist listing, a broken authentication record — are raised at any volume.
They are part of the measured traffic, yes — a spam report on transactional mail is a real and serious signal, and it suppresses that address permanently at the provider. What transactional mail is exempt from is the brake: it keeps going even when marketing is paused.

See also

Sending domain

The records that authenticate your mail, and what breaks when they lapse.

What Gmail sees

Close the one blind spot our own complaint rate cannot cover.

Tracking domain

Move the links and images inside your emails onto your own domain.

Broadcasts

Pacing, stopping, and how the brake behaves at launch time.